Discussion about this post

User's avatar
L Dave Sandeman's avatar

OK, we get it. You didn't like Pierre Poilievre. In spite of his clearly thought out platform and its very reasonable presentation in the debate, his previous fixation on the dismal ten year record of the Liberals was "too Trumpy". Taking a cue from your own objection that Carney is "nothing like" Trudeau, Mr Poilievre is nothing like trump. What Piere has vaguely in common with trump is that both purport to stand for the rank and file ordinary voters as opposed to the entitled arrogant morally smug economically incompetent left wing elite. Both of them walk upright on two legs too. There the similarity ends. Moreover, by that standard of left wing elitism, Carney is indeed Trudeau 2.0. Being fair, agreed that Carney is at least an adult, which, yes, is a big improvement over Trudeau. Oh and he plans to grow our national debt by about $225 billion over four years. That works out to about a $56 billion a year deficit. So again, you're correct Warren, Carney is "nothing like" Trudeau. Our ex's typical deficits were more on the order of 20 billion per year. That makes Mr Carney sort of a "Trudeau on steroids", economically speaking. Definitely a difference, yes. But his biggest "Trudeau-ism" seems to me to be his absolutely MIA stand against Jew hatred here in Canada. That, for me at least is an absolute deal breaker. Both opposing men have one major positive quality: they are adults. That distinguishes both of them well from both overgrown teenager Trudeau and childlike bullying demagogue trump. So please can we quit dumping on Poilievre? He at least can be counted on to take a firm stand against domestic Jew hatred.

Expand full comment
Martin Dixon's avatar

Pierre certainly may not be perfect but at least he is not a condescending, misogynistic, arrogant, smug, know it all, micro manager so there's that!

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts